From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Simon Barber <simon@devicescape.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
David Kimdon <dwhedon@devicescape.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:32:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162477954.10786.11.camel@ux156> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061102141815.GA1795@infradead.org>
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:18 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This is not about the name that makes sense. I think using ethX names
> for wireless devices is utterly stupid, but it's what all current upstream
> drivers do, and at least for WE compat we'll have to stick to it.
No, that's not true, zd1201 doesn't [1] :) Has anyoen ever complained
about that? In any case, tools iterate all netdevs and call some
wireless ioctl to check if they are wireless, or
check /proc/net/wireless (which is actually bad, but ...).
Besides, WE never said that names have to have certain names. What makes
you think so?
johannes
[1]
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;h=36b29ff058141a712619e55184566b39ce414efd;hb=aefba081d7b7dfd1c5752f6e6e709d8b5ab80ab7;f=drivers/net/wireless/zd1201.c#l1790
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-02 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 22:04 [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc David Kimdon
2006-10-25 23:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 1:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 2:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-26 3:37 ` Simon Barber
2006-10-26 5:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-26 5:15 ` Simon Barber
2006-11-01 10:28 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-01 14:20 ` John W. Linville
2006-11-01 18:31 ` James Ketrenos
2006-11-02 0:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-02 1:48 ` d80211 merge (was Re: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc) James Ketrenos
2006-11-02 2:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-02 8:49 ` cfg80211/nl80211/WE (was: Re: d80211 merge) Johannes Berg
2006-11-02 8:59 ` cfg80211/nl80211/WE Jeff Garzik
2006-11-02 10:56 ` cfg80211/nl80211/WE (was: Re: d80211 merge) Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-02 12:03 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-02 12:16 ` [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-02 14:05 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-02 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-02 14:32 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2006-11-02 14:41 ` Jochen Friedrich
2006-11-02 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-02 15:02 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-02 16:38 ` Simon Barber
2006-11-02 15:42 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-02 16:09 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2006-11-02 18:38 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-02 20:58 ` Dan Williams
2006-11-02 21:27 ` Simon Barber
2006-11-02 22:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-02 23:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-11-02 14:22 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-02 16:33 ` [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specific qdisc Simon Barber
2006-11-02 16:43 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-02 22:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-02 22:56 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-03 19:23 ` [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather thand80211-specificqdisc Simon Barber
2006-11-03 19:29 ` Simon Barber
2006-11-03 19:39 ` John W. Linville
2006-11-03 23:07 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-04 2:20 ` [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops ratherthand80211-specificqdisc Simon Barber
2006-11-02 14:06 ` [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc John W. Linville
2006-10-26 1:34 ` Simon Barber
2006-10-26 1:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 3:17 ` Simon Barber
2006-10-26 2:04 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162477954.10786.11.camel@ux156 \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=dwhedon@devicescape.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon@devicescape.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).