From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Jouni Malinen <jkm@devicescape.com>,
Simon Barber <simon@devicescape.com>,
Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>,
David Kimdon <david.kimdon@devicescape.com>,
James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] convert d80211 to a proper protocol
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:09:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162847394.1412.17.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061106210145.6824bec6@griffin.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3354 bytes --]
[reordering a bit]
> > This changes the 'cookie' that d80211 returns from alloc_hw
> > to be an opaque value to the driver. Turned out that it wasn't
> > such a great idea but since it was generally a clean up I kept
> > this patch to base my other patches on.
>
> ACK.
> What did happen with
> d80211: add a function to get the wiphy index
> d80211: add a perm_addr hardware property
> d80211: add a struct device* hardware property
> d80211: add a ethtool_ops hardware property
> patches?
Well after some chat with a few people I decided that it was stupid and
not very maintainable to copy all the fields in net_device to a new
structure.
> > 009-d80211-convert-spaces.patch
> > d80211: convert leading spaces to tabs
> >
> > I hated working on the code, so I did this. The next patch
> > breaks everything anyway.
>
> NAK. There are too many patches pending. Let's do this just before
> merging.
Oh come off it! It's really stupid to have to check all the tabs/spaces
all the time. The patch changes 451 lines. And wiggle can handle that
just fine. Besides, if you do
s/^\+ /+\t/
s/^- /-\t/
s/ /\t/
on your patches, they'll be fine too.
> This is too big patch for a review,
Yeah. It's pretty bad actually, but I couldn't really find a good way to
split it into logical chunks.
> > * The mdev no longer has a sub_if_data attached (why ever did it??)
> > It's private area is for the driver since we don't create it but
> > the driver does. I did keep the notation of mdev/master all through,
> > but it's no longer the stacks device. Keep that in mind.
>
> This definitely breaks AP mode. In the code, there is heavily (ab)used
> the fact that the master device is in fact an AP device. I tried to fix
> that but it was so difficult I gave up. It is needed to rewrite the
> whole RX path (and even that is probably not enough).
Bugger. I didn't notice that. I'll have a look. That is indeed a
showstopper.
> As this will
> be fixed for free when we have native 802.11 devices, I don't think we
> need to do anything about it now.
I don't think I understand this. I mean, my patch actually gives us
native 802.11 devices by making the drivers register those and then
handling them virtually similar to how 8021q handles ethernet devices. I
honestly thought that this was the plan for said "native 802.11
devices".
> > * sysfs layout changed. There is no wiphy or an ieee80211 class any more,
> > the attributes that used to be there are now in the net_device that
> > the driver registered, and our attributes are below the devices we created.
>
> You want an ieee80211 class. Once you get rid of a master interface you
> need something with per-hardware information, statistics etc.
Yeah, I gave up trying to get rid of the master interface in favour of
having a native 802.11 device which is registered by the phy driver
instead.
> > * sysfs layout changed. There is no wiphy or an ieee80211 class any more,
> > the attributes that used to be there are now in the net_device that
> > the driver registered, and our attributes are below the devices we created.
>
> Doesn't belong to this patch.
Had to be here initially due to the way I did things, but ok, probably
changeable.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-05 15:39 [PATCH 0/11] convert d80211 to a proper protocol Johannes Berg
2006-11-05 16:54 ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-11-05 17:05 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-05 17:09 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-05 17:06 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-06 20:01 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-06 21:09 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2006-11-08 11:58 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-08 12:33 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-08 13:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-06 23:06 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-08 12:09 ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-08 12:53 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-07 18:52 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-07 19:02 ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-11-07 20:33 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162847394.1412.17.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=david.kimdon@devicescape.com \
--cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
--cc=hong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jkm@devicescape.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon@devicescape.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).