From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: Volanomark slowdown Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:44:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1163015053.3138.378.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <1162924354.10806.172.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1163001318.3138.346.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061108162955.GA4364@suse.de> <1163011132.10806.189.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olaf Kirch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@sunset.davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:24722 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422691AbWKHToT (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:44:19 -0500 To: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com In-Reply-To: <1163011132.10806.189.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > However, Volanomark is just a benchmark to alert us to changes. > If in real applications with small segment, this patch is > needed to fix congestion window adjustment as Dave pointed > out, and impact on bandwidth not as important, so be it. > > Tim if we can get the best of both worlds (by having the extra acks drop on congestion) it's of course nicer ;) -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org