From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][XFRM]: Sub-policies beautification Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:49:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1163782194.5219.3.camel@jzny2> References: <1163772616.5107.40.camel@jzny2> <20061117164253.GE8693@postel.suug.ch> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Masahide NAKAMURA , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx03.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.106]:14990 "EHLO mx03.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755705AbWKQQt4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:49:56 -0500 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21]) by mx03.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Gl6ue-0002lj-8w for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:50:00 -0500 To: Thomas Graf In-Reply-To: <20061117164253.GE8693@postel.suug.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-17-11 at 17:42 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > Could you maybe use u8 instead of the userspace alternative __u8? > Good catch. I think i know how i missed that one - TheLinuxWay;-> theres a few __u8s in there unrelated. So i will send an additional patch that fixes that and the rest of em. Sounds good? cheers, jamal