From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:34:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1163954089.15473.16.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1163802439.3392.47.camel@johannes.berg> <1163895673.15473.11.camel@johannes.berg> <20061119155628.GA25061@devicescape.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5p1dk9E06ysYc1phQWbx" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc , "John W. Linville" , Simon Barber , Jouni Malinen , Hong Liu , Michael Wu , Michael Buesch , Ivo van Doorn Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:5801 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756768AbWKSQgi (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:36:38 -0500 To: David Kimdon In-Reply-To: <20061119155628.GA25061@devicescape.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-5p1dk9E06ysYc1phQWbx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 07:56 -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > What is wrong with the driver setting the function pointer to NULL for > the cards that do not support scanning? Where does this requirment > come from that the function pointers in struct ieee80211_wiphy be > identical for all cards? Well I want to allow drivers to make assign the 33 function pointers in a static structure, and differences between cards must then be handled in the non-static part. johannes --=-5p1dk9E06ysYc1phQWbx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBFYIeo/ETPhpq3jKURApS2AJ9pRwI164hZBW/uf2I2VwePeqvQEACfXszD HlNznGVNzQyC02bmahtwzKU= =SJFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5p1dk9E06ysYc1phQWbx--