From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:54:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1163958886.15473.31.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1163802439.3392.47.camel@johannes.berg> <1163895673.15473.11.camel@johannes.berg> <20061119155628.GA25061@devicescape.com> <1163954089.15473.16.camel@johannes.berg> <20061119165521.GB25557@devicescape.com> <1163955459.15473.28.camel@johannes.berg> <20061119172528.GA26466@devicescape.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sIB5QWCLBwwZ67CkLCtK" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc , "John W. Linville" , Simon Barber , Jouni Malinen , Hong Liu , Michael Wu , Michael Buesch , Ivo van Doorn Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:25003 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932502AbWKSR4h (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:56:37 -0500 To: David Kimdon In-Reply-To: <20061119172528.GA26466@devicescape.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-sIB5QWCLBwwZ67CkLCtK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 09:25 -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > Perhaps that is a split that we do not need? I don't see the problem > that 'd80211: split ieee80211_hw' is solving. I do see what it is > doing, but maybe I am missing something . . . =20 Oh, I just figured that on 64-bit systems the _ops part is something like 264 bytes that we needlessly allocate for every device when in reality it doesn't really change between cards for a single driver. johannes --=-sIB5QWCLBwwZ67CkLCtK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBFYJpl/ETPhpq3jKURAg9GAJ4h50nciXLYbazMDw9vAk9FdaquMQCeKktL I8zzCj+Uvl4kqul+S8mphKs= =Sfla -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sIB5QWCLBwwZ67CkLCtK--