From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Brivio <st3@riseup.net>,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softmac: remove netif_tx_disable when scanning
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:51:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1164559882.22909.5.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4569C2D0.8080406@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1106 bytes --]
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 11:37 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> However the other reason for the patch (transmit
> queue needed for active scanning) is bogus,
I think that was just a misunderstanding.
> and the patch introduces a
> problem where session frames may be transmitted during scanning (using
> TX queue control avoids that problem).
Which is really the reason why we put that there in the first place :)
> Stack-level refcounted TX control like this would also be beneficial for
> zd1211rw, currently we have a semi-ugly implementation inside the driver.
> I agree with the objectives of this patch but the way I see it is that
> it trades one bug for another. A proper solution, as suggested by
> Johannes (refcounted stack-level TX control) would not be hard to
> implement and would solve the bug without introducing another.
Would you actually need a fully refcounted enable/disable? Because for
the stack it wouldn't be required if it'd simply not start scanning when
queue is disabled and stop scanning immediately when queue stop is
requested.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-26 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-26 0:16 [PATCH] softmac: remove netif_tx_disable when scanning Larry Finger
2006-11-26 4:05 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-26 10:03 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-26 12:12 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <200611261312.20442.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 13:05 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4569912C.1000506-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 13:06 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <1164535408.21459.3.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 16:37 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-26 16:51 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
[not found] ` <1164559882.22909.5.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 18:25 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-26 18:40 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1164566436.22909.26.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 19:03 ` Larry Finger
2006-11-27 4:13 ` Daniel Drake
2006-11-27 15:49 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <45691273.9090803-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2006-11-26 10:07 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-26 12:25 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1164559882.22909.5.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=st3@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).