From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: slab allocation fairness
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:28:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1164972527.6588.186.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611301132530.24161@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 11:33 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > No, the forced allocation is to test the allocation hardness at that
> > point in time. I could not think of another way to test that than to
> > actually to an allocation.
>
> Typically we do this by checking the number of free pages in a zone
> compared to the high low limits. See mmzone.h.
This doesn't work under high load because of direct reclaim. And if I go
run direct reclaim to test if I can raise the free pages level to an
acceptable level for the given gfp flags, I might as well do the whole
allocation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-01 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061130101451.495412000@chello.nl>
[not found] ` <20061130101922.328418000@chello.nl>
2006-11-30 12:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] net: vm deadlock avoidance core Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20061130101921.113055000@chello.nl>
2006-11-30 18:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: slab allocation fairness Christoph Lameter
2006-11-30 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-30 19:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-30 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-01 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2006-11-30 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-30 19:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-30 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-30 20:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-30 20:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-30 20:29 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20061130101922.175620000@chello.nl>
2006-11-30 18:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] slab: kmem_cache_objs_to_pages() Christoph Lameter
2006-11-30 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-30 19:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-30 19:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-01 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1164972527.6588.186.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).