From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] add auditing to ipsec
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:50:45 -0500
Message-ID: <1164973845.3562.14.camel@localhost>
References: <200611272226.kARMQGor018386@faith.austin.ibm.com>
	 <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611280007220.3617@d.namei>
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, sgrubb@redhat.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224]:53719 "EHLO
	nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S936476AbWLALuu (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:50:50 -0500
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so1518631nze
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:50:49 -0800 (PST)
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
In-Reply-To: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0611280007220.3617@d.namei>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2006-28-11 at 00:08 -0500, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Joy Latten wrote:

> Looks ok to me.
> 

Seems like a lot of other xfrm commands are not covered though?
Design intent?

cheers,
jamal