From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Eric Lemoine <eric.lemoine@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch sungem] improved locking
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:12:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1165979533.11914.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cac192f0611291437g26fefebdocdacbb0cd2aa2fdd@mail.gmail.com>
Been hitting a raw throughput in both directions plus a few other things
on a dual G5 and the driver didn't crash :-)
I'm seeing a problem though but I'm not sure it's related to your patch,
I'll have to test without it.
Basically, if I use a slightly modified versio of tridge's socklib (raw
xput test, basically, a tcp connection with one side pushing as fast as
it can a known pattern and the other one just receiving and verifying
the data integrity), it works fine when running only one side (either rx
or tx, doesn't matter).
But if I start it both ways (that is both a receiver and a sender on the
GMAC box) and the other end is a tg3 (quad g5), then I'm getting a lot
of eth0: RX MAC fifo overflow smac[02045822 but there are other numbers
here every now and then] errors on the sungem side.
David, could that be the pause stuff not working properly ?
The link is gigabit and the tg3 side doesn't complain about anything.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-13 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-09 21:33 [patch sungem] improved locking Eric Lemoine
2006-11-09 23:04 ` David Miller
2006-11-10 13:28 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-11-10 20:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-10 20:42 ` David Miller
2006-11-12 23:11 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-11-14 0:46 ` David Miller
2006-11-14 7:28 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-11-14 7:44 ` David Miller
2006-11-14 21:54 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-11-28 22:49 ` David Miller
2006-11-28 22:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-28 23:43 ` David Miller
2006-11-29 0:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-29 10:16 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-11-29 10:56 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-11-29 22:37 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-12-13 3:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-12-13 3:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-13 4:03 ` David Miller
2006-12-13 4:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-29 5:05 ` David Miller
2006-12-29 21:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-29 23:20 ` David Miller
2006-12-12 1:43 ` David Miller
2006-12-12 5:33 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-12-12 5:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-12 5:49 ` Eric Lemoine
2006-12-15 0:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-18 1:15 ` David Miller
2006-12-18 1:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1165979533.11914.114.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.lemoine@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).