From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C48FC433EF for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 19:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236450AbiF3TS5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:18:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53098 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236323AbiF3TS4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:18:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A88A338A7 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id g26so40849465ejb.5 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7w5OzUyrKBr7BCgXCHhdgRFzQT4xsZpFPm8KzjByaI4=; b=zCeMUNOfntMVAU5Y7fXXHfAKu+zJfL/KMa4HLDyGpOVZ6UdbmR1l/o+NZx+u+y4SO7 Jz5KU6n1YkD1wXb2Nevnugb1+jC1XVcReK/TCp5LH606t+u08i3wBZ6KU6EOAlJggHRJ EDBYU4P04OevgoI32J/3BnD4FzAg8fLl1h7Wi1dKbEuiYGqcjGrWUfFlnyBxEyqR3dOS OLOLxNl2MzWfwc+OljIXYPHPtZ7dIsBz7arrBlL6Smt6GbZIp70d2TxNXQ5sK93pPYxD 0+2M161XdiC3Bf8GRfhb94lzGZtSk2eYo3Ce/tcXu70Cy02diKj8ms9p8skb9yRI/mnN 5KOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7w5OzUyrKBr7BCgXCHhdgRFzQT4xsZpFPm8KzjByaI4=; b=eIZCR0mV7Oug3qCU2xFza1YNXV8XzUVk49efTpMkYggDtSnHN4eMRQai1DgGEvjWdN 86QBp9hzyER2Jf7UJUsouMOI2Eqx6fxrYcCq5m8xjqf+pbxRuHFhc3XVHUBLZe/hjd40 DGgjzHj/l2siinsdZtqMyn/BxdmN4unYq+SBUX8U4tqAstzyTVJghs1qmy+aqgUcYPoH j19bVmBaHXgQy/iTObxTY4+EqYRAAJwc1DQEw6oC7oj2I4T76RfI9KRCr90A0vUB4qPn m5bY5lw+B4p6lhx8NWAycCl1RRlPzK5GBoAAk7DIQAqvYb4Knj8uirQOlt4/NREt0W0t Ws+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/BHm99OpkMIWfLbPzTIqZT9L3OGVPOVuNRWhvo1+vd5VvUzb2f lKAVIaFZ7OSu/lCNrv+IyU9sqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1srhyIGbBAQSZ2gSpw2QM/aUcoX6PxApzziyDFXIwNHe90zVHuEOcJjIkuOrCKF39Lp0gJwIg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7482:b0:722:ea8f:3a12 with SMTP id e2-20020a170906748200b00722ea8f3a12mr10565319ejl.220.1656616733710; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.190] (xdsl-188-155-176-92.adslplus.ch. [188.155.176.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q22-20020aa7da96000000b004357cec7e48sm9859911eds.13.2022.06.30.12.18.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <116f0087-17d1-652f-23f5-b114e6082273@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 21:18:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] ARM: dts: lan966x: use new microchip,lan9668-switch compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Walle , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Horatiu Vultur Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220630140237.692986-1-michael@walle.cc> <20220630140237.692986-5-michael@walle.cc> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20220630140237.692986-5-michael@walle.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 30/06/2022 16:02, Michael Walle wrote: > The old generic microchip,lan966x-switch compatible string was > deprecated. Use the new one. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/lan966x.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lan966x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lan966x.dtsi > index 48971d80c82c..da0657c57cdf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lan966x.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lan966x.dtsi > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ soc { > ranges; > > switch: switch@e0000000 { > - compatible = "microchip,lan966x-switch"; > + compatible = "microchip,lan9668-switch"; While technically correct, the change cannot go via independent trees and may break out-of-tree users of this DTS. Usually the nicer way is to use two compatibles (the old as fallback). Anyway, this one is fine with me - up to subarch maintainer. Best regards, Krzysztof