From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: Optional TX/RX path optimized for SMP Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:28:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1172910508.8184.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200702231730.58579.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann , Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , Stefan Roscher To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:43435 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbXCCI2r (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:28:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 04:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Jan-Bernd Themann writes: > > > > Are there any concerns about this approach? > > Yes. You should fix the NAPI code instead of trying to work > around it. NAPI is being fixed but the fix will take time to get in. In the meantime, the solution to get something working is the workaround. Ben.