From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: is CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT always set ? Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1177369190.4096.13.camel@localhost> References: <97949e3e0704231419o21062b6cl5b8cf38e1b412b05@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Chavey Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]:34093 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754465AbXDWW7y (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:59:54 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so1969931wxd for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:59:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <97949e3e0704231419o21062b6cl5b8cf38e1b412b05@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 14:19 -0700, Laurent Chavey wrote: > if CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not defined, then is the > code below correct ? The simple answer is yes; Is something not working for you? It is hard to read your question my good friend because it comes out like a trick question;-> It is more useful to say: "I think this code is broken because ...." And even more useful if you add: "I have run the following testcases to illustrate blah ..." Then if something is broken, and you want to be popular, you say: "netdevers, heres the fix" Anyways, what is the problem? cheers, jamal