From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] export SAD info Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:54:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1177516490.9923.7.camel@localhost> References: <1177515761.9923.3.camel@localhost> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: davem@davemloft.net Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.234]:60316 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031151AbXDYPyy (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:54:54 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so279745wxd for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:54:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1177515761.9923.3.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org That patch has xfrm_state_num being mucked with; just ignore that bit. I need to send a patch against net-2.6.22 and i will clean that up - just need some feedback. Would it make sense to have those vars as u32 instead of unsigned int? cheers, jamal