From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet device (tunnel) Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 08:49:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1178110192.4074.55.camel@localhost> References: <46386DFB.7090109@sw.ru> <46388562.9050305@trash.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pavel Emelianov , David Miller , Ben Greear , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Netdev List , Linux Containers , Kirill Korotaev , Alexey Kuznetsov , devel@openvz.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233]:10411 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993092AbXEBMt4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 08:49:56 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so106369wxd for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 05:49:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46388562.9050305@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-02-05 at 14:34 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Thats a lot better than using sysfs, but I think it would be > preferrable to use rtnetlink instead of genetlink for network > configuration. or you can just hold rtnl while using genl. I do agree it would be easier to just use rtnetlink ... cheers, jamal