From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Leech Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22 Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:27:44 -0700 Message-ID: <1178148464.16670.14.camel@cleech-lnx> References: <1178145460.16258.3.camel@cleech-lnx> <20070502.154403.77034296.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:10494 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767227AbXEBX1j (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 19:27:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070502.154403.77034296.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:44 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Chrstopher, I really really would like you to post these patches early > and often to netdev@vger.kernel.org especially because you are > touching the TCP code. You're right, I should have sent this to netdev as well. I'm Sorry. As for early and often, I have posted all of these patches to netdev, and made suggested changes, and re-posted. And when I have other networking changes, you can bet they'll get sent to netdev for review first before I think about asking that they be included. > You aren't doing this, for several rounds, and just submitting your > stuff directly to Linus, Andrew, and lkml, and it's starting to annoy > me greatly. For several rounds, I've been posting patches that go nowhere. I honestly don't care if they go straight to Linus, through you, or through Andrew. - Chris