From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] SAD info TLV aggregation Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 09:26:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1178198764.4077.30.camel@localhost> References: <1178144288.4078.5.camel@localhost> <4639298E.8090100@trash.net> <1178197316.4077.4.camel@localhost> <4639E08F.5030101@trash.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233]:26221 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754114AbXECN0J (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 09:26:09 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so438162wxd for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:26:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4639E08F.5030101@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 15:15 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > > I think it may be reasonable to group the Hash info in one TLV > > and the IPSEC specific info in a separate TLV - is this what you are > > saying? Be explicit so i dont have to redo the patch over and over. > > Yes, thats what I imagined too. Ok, thanks Patrick - indeed it is a wise thing to do to improve longevity of user space. I will make those two changes sometime tonight or tommorow morn and resend. cheers, jamal