From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12 Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 21:41:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1178307709.2767.19.camel@lappy> References: <20070504102651.923946304@chello.nl> <20070504.122716.31641374.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, tgraf@suug.ch, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, phillips@google.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.15]:9938 "EHLO amsfep18-int.chello.nl" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422665AbXEDTqt (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 15:46:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070504.122716.31641374.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:27 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:26:51 +0200 > > > There is a fundamental deadlock associated with paging; > > I know you'd really like people like myself to review this work, but a > set of 40 patches is just too much to try and digest at once > especially when I have other things going on. I realize this, however I expected you to mainly look at the the 10 network related patches, namely: 11/40 - 20/40. I know they build upon the previous 10 patches, which are mostly VM, and you seem to have an interest in that as well, so that would be 20 patches to look at. Still a sizable set. How would you prefer I present these? The other patches are NFS and iSCSI, I'd not expect you to review those in depth.