From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 11:45:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1178617538.18162.54.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1178313748.7408.41.camel@johannes.berg> <1178616837.3385.85.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FNQF8PP8W5XMUkYcnX77" Cc: jamal , "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" , Stephen Hemminger , Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, cramerj , "Kok, Auke-jan H" , "Leech, Christopher" , davem@davemloft.net To: Zhu Yi Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:39940 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966194AbXEHJni (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 05:43:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1178616837.3385.85.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-FNQF8PP8W5XMUkYcnX77 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Somehow I didn't see the mails inbetween. Let me think. On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 17:33 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > Jamal, as you said, the wireless subsystem uses an interim workaround > (the extra netdev approach) to achieve hardware packets scheduling. But > with Peter's patch, the wireless stack doesn't need the workaround > anymore. This is the actual fix. Actually, we still need multiple devices for virtual devices? Or which multiple devices are you talking about here? johannes --=-FNQF8PP8W5XMUkYcnX77 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGQEbC/ETPhpq3jKURAiC2AKCmOysevErQGPor4TAI/OSy4evwyACgtQdF fsMcpH7+RyAY+TvBpFBwF/c= =VdFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FNQF8PP8W5XMUkYcnX77--