netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
	cramerj <cramerj@intel.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:02:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178766140.3045.24.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178666902.4055.28.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 19:28 -0400, jamal wrote:
> Wireless with CSMA/CA is a slightly different beast due to the shared
> channels; its worse but not very different in nature than the case
> where you have a shared ethernet hub (CSMA/CD) and you keep adding
> hosts to it 

The difference is the hub provides the same transmission chance for all
the packets but in wireless, high priority packets will block low
priority packets transmission. You can argue there is still chances a
low priority packet is sent first before a high priority one. But this
is not the point of wireless QoS. It rarely happens and should be avoid
at best effort in the implementation.

Thanks,
-yi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-25  1:39 [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2007-04-25  4:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-25 11:36   ` jamal
2007-04-25 17:45     ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 13:27       ` jamal
2007-04-26 15:57         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:30           ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 16:44             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:50               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-27 15:09             ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:45               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-30 12:56                 ` jamal
2007-05-01 18:27                   ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-01 22:11                     ` jamal
2007-05-01 23:04                       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-02 12:43                         ` jamal
2007-05-03 21:03                           ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-03 23:54                             ` jamal
2007-05-04 15:48                               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 20:01                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-04 20:06                               ` David Miller
2007-05-04 20:43                               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 21:00                                 ` David Miller
2007-05-04 21:22                                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08  9:33                                   ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-08  9:45                                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08 13:28                                       ` jamal
2007-05-08 15:35                                         ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-08 23:28                                           ` jamal
2007-05-10  3:02                                             ` Zhu Yi [this message]
2007-05-10 12:35                                               ` jamal
2007-05-11  1:58                                                 ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-11  2:23                                                   ` jamal
2007-05-10 18:22                                             ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-10 20:00                                               ` jamal
2007-05-09 14:16                                         ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 14:58           ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:43             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-27 15:46               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 18:49       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1178766140.3045.24.camel@debian.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=cramerj@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).