netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize return value of qdisc_restart
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:50:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178801437.4074.37.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178799661.4074.20.camel@localhost>

Never mind, I was wrong. qdisc run will be invoked by cpu0; i.e:
 
 CPU0                 CPU1
  + grab qlock         |
  |                    + find that return code is 0
  | enq pkt X          + release qdisc running
  |                    |
  + grab qdisc running | ==> outta here
  | call qdisc_run
  + release qlock     

Should have looked at my netconf slides first ;->

cheers,
jamal

On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 08:21 -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 04:55 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:50:39 +1000
> > 
> 
> > T_SCHED]: Rationalise return value of qdisc_restart
> > > 
> > > The current return value scheme and associated comment was invented
> > > back in the 20th century when we still had that tbusy flag.  Things
> > > have changed quite a bit since then (even Tony Blair is moving on
> > > now, not to mention the new French president).
> > > 
> > > All we need to indicate now is whether the caller should continue
> > > processing the queue.  Therefore it's sufficient if we return 0 if
> > > we want to stop and non-zero otherwise.
> > > 
> > > This is based on a patch by Krishna Kumar.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > 
> > Fair enough, patch applied :-)
> 
> Ok, see if this makes sense:
> 
> CPU0                 CPU1 (holding qdisc running)
>   .                    |
>   .                    |
>   .                    + grab qlock
>   .                    |
>   .                    | deq pkt
>   .                    + release qlock
>   .                    + grab txlock
>   .                    |  send pkt
>   .                    + release txlock
>   .                    + grab qlock
>    has pktX            | (NEW: qlen = 0); return 0 instead of -1
>    waiting for qlock   + release qlock
>   + grab qlock         |
>   |                    + find that return code is 0
>   | enq pkt X          + release qdisc running
>   |                    |
>   + release qlock      | ==> outta here
> 
> pkt X is stuck unless some event happens such as a new pkt arrival. 
> In other words it sits there for an indeterminate period.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-08  7:31 [PATCH] sched: Optimize return value of qdisc_restart Krishna Kumar
2007-05-09  2:05 ` David Miller
2007-05-09  4:35   ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-05-09  6:36     ` David Miller
2007-05-09  7:23       ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-05-09  8:12         ` David Miller
2007-05-09 12:56           ` jamal
2007-05-09 14:47             ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-05-09 15:52               ` jamal
2007-05-10  5:12                 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-05-10 11:50                   ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-10 11:55                     ` David Miller
2007-05-10 12:10                       ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-10 21:11                         ` David Miller
2007-05-10 12:21                       ` jamal
2007-05-10 12:50                         ` jamal [this message]
2007-05-10 12:59                         ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-10 13:18                           ` jamal
2007-05-10 13:52                             ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-10 14:12                               ` jamal
2007-05-10 14:26                                 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-05-10 14:31                                   ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1178801437.4074.37.camel@localhost \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).