netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
	cramerj <cramerj@intel.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:23:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178850215.4074.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178848682.3045.82.camel@debian.sh.intel.com>

On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 09:58 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:

> 
> Good, we agree on this. 

Good start.

> Now let's solve the problem.
> 

Lets take it slowly, because i think i wasnt getting anywhere with
Peter. See if you make sense of what i am saying maybe we can make
progress.

> When the low priority ring buffer is full in the hardware, will you
> suppose the driver call netif_stop_queue() or not? 

Yes, I will. 
With a note: This is precisely what i have been saying all along
in my posting. I explained my reasoning; if you missed the why I think i
should write it up.
So in order to make progress - i am going to not respond to the rest of
the email; tell me if you dont understand me and i will do a write up
hopefully tommorow or over the weekend.
Or tell me you understand me and disagree because of ....

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-11  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-25  1:39 [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2007-04-25  4:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-25 11:36   ` jamal
2007-04-25 17:45     ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 13:27       ` jamal
2007-04-26 15:57         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:30           ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 16:44             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:50               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-27 15:09             ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:45               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-30 12:56                 ` jamal
2007-05-01 18:27                   ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-01 22:11                     ` jamal
2007-05-01 23:04                       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-02 12:43                         ` jamal
2007-05-03 21:03                           ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-03 23:54                             ` jamal
2007-05-04 15:48                               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 20:01                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-04 20:06                               ` David Miller
2007-05-04 20:43                               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 21:00                                 ` David Miller
2007-05-04 21:22                                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08  9:33                                   ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-08  9:45                                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08 13:28                                       ` jamal
2007-05-08 15:35                                         ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-08 23:28                                           ` jamal
2007-05-10  3:02                                             ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-10 12:35                                               ` jamal
2007-05-11  1:58                                                 ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-11  2:23                                                   ` jamal [this message]
2007-05-10 18:22                                             ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-10 20:00                                               ` jamal
2007-05-09 14:16                                         ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 14:58           ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:43             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-27 15:46               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 18:49       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1178850215.4074.6.camel@localhost \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=cramerj@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).