From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:23:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1178850215.4074.6.camel@localhost> References: <1178666902.4055.28.camel@localhost> <1178766140.3045.24.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <1178800551.4074.34.camel@localhost> <1178848682.3045.82.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" , Johannes Berg , Stephen Hemminger , Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, cramerj , "Kok, Auke-jan H" , "Leech, Christopher" , davem@davemloft.net To: Zhu Yi Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.236]:7575 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754326AbXEKCXk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 22:23:40 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so737750wxd for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 19:23:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1178848682.3045.82.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 09:58 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > > Good, we agree on this. Good start. > Now let's solve the problem. > Lets take it slowly, because i think i wasnt getting anywhere with Peter. See if you make sense of what i am saying maybe we can make progress. > When the low priority ring buffer is full in the hardware, will you > suppose the driver call netif_stop_queue() or not? Yes, I will. With a note: This is precisely what i have been saying all along in my posting. I explained my reasoning; if you missed the why I think i should write it up. So in order to make progress - i am going to not respond to the rest of the email; tell me if you dont understand me and i will do a write up hopefully tommorow or over the weekend. Or tell me you understand me and disagree because of .... cheers, jamal