netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: take 3 [RFC] make qdisc_restart more readable
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:56:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178999773.15622.44.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4645F325.3060607@trash.net>

On Sat, 2007-12-05 at 19:02 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h

> >  #define NETDEV_TX_LOCKED -1	/* driver tx lock was already taken */
> > +#define NETDEV_TX_DROP -2	/* request caller to drop packet */
> 
> This shouldn't be a NETDEV_TX code since its only handled correctly
> internally for handle_dev_cpu_collision().
> 
> > +#define NETDEV_TX_QUEUE -3	/* request caller to requeue packet */
> 
> How will this be used? The driver can simply stop the queue if
> it doesn't want to receive more packets.
> 

I can make those part of a different namespace; 
put defines in sch_generic sound reasonable?

> > +static inline int handle_dev_cpu_collision(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	if (dev->xmit_lock_owner == smp_processor_id()) {
> 
> unlikely would make sense here.
> 

sure.

> > +static inline int
> > +handle_dev_requeue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)
> > +{
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(q == &noop_qdisc))
> > +		kfree_skb(skb);
> 
> Why is this special-casing needed? __qdisc_run already checks for
> noop_qdisc and noop has a proper requeue function.
> 

Good catch: That was a patch from Herbert after Thomas' "q refresh"
patch. So i was just replicating. I will fix it. Note: I think that
change may have made it to -stable?

> > +	else if (skb->next)
> > +		dev->gso_skb = skb;
> 
> The gso_skb cases could probably also be marked unlikely.
> 

will do.

> > +
> > +static inline int
> > +handle_tx_locked(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)
> 
> handle_.* sounds a bit like "I couldn't think of a better name" :)
> How about dev_tx_locked()?
> 

dev_tx_islocked()?

> > +	if (unlikely (ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY)) {
> > +		/* XXX: Do we need a ratelimit? or put a
> > +		 * BUG_ON((int) ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY) ?
> > +		 **/
> > +		printk("BUG %s code %d qlen %d\n",dev->name, ret, q->q.qlen);
> 
> BUG_ON sounds a bit extreme, net_ratelimit() makes sense.

Ok. 

Thanks a lot Patrick.

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-12 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11  0:13 [RFC] make qdisc_restart more readable jamal
2007-05-11 15:56 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 18:04   ` jamal
2007-05-11 18:13     ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 18:35       ` jamal
2007-05-11 18:46         ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 19:29           ` take 2 WAS (RE: " jamal
2007-05-11 22:01             ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 22:43               ` jamal
2007-05-12  9:46             ` Thomas Graf
2007-05-12 11:58               ` jamal
2007-05-12 12:18             ` take 3 " jamal
2007-05-12 17:02               ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-12 19:56                 ` jamal [this message]
2007-05-13 14:28                   ` [LAST CALL] [PATCH] [NET_SCHED]make " jamal
2007-05-14 10:40                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 12:41                       ` jamal
2007-05-14 12:43                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 13:30                     ` jamal
2007-05-14 20:09                       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-16 22:55                       ` jamal
2007-05-16 23:00                         ` David Miller
2007-05-16 23:15                         ` Sridhar Samudrala
2007-05-17  2:12                           ` jamal
2007-05-11 17:01 ` [RFC] make " Thomas Graf
2007-05-11 18:11   ` jamal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1178999773.15622.44.camel@localhost \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).