From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Chan" Subject: Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:48:39 -0700 Message-ID: <1179265719.25622.40.camel@dell> References: <200705130800.44595.ak@suse.de> <20070515.131840.52167955.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David Miller" , ak@suse.de, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, "netdev" To: "Roland Dreier" Return-path: Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]:2417 "EHLO mms1.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754348AbXEOVAZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2007 17:00:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 13:52 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Well, IPoIB doesn't do netif_wake_queue() until half the device's TX > queue is free, so we should get batching. However, I'm not sure that > I can count on a fudge factor ensuring that there's enough space to > handle everything skb_gso_segment() gives me -- is there any reliable > way to get an upper bound on how many segments a given gso skb will > use when it's segmented? Take a look at tg3.c. I use (gso_segs * 3) as the upper bound.