netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/02]: Flexible SFQ flow classification
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:34:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1180542897.4109.81.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465DA4E9.5060906@trash.net>

On Wed, 2007-30-05 at 18:23 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> I think exposing SFQ's queues as classes is a good thing, it allows
> you to do whatever classification you want. In fact I'm probably
> going to add patch on top to also dump them to userspace. 

Yes, that would be useful.

> What
> remains for SFQ to do is serve the queues evenly.

And it does (yes, I looked at the patch;->).  

> My classifier seperates them entirely. The only thing it keeps
> in SFQ is the old classifier for compatibility, besides that its
> exactly what you say. It should be easily possible to remove it
> entirely and use my classifier in a compatible configuration
> automatically.
> 

If you removed it entirely (and had it as a separate classifier) IMO
that would be a better approach. Then what you have is a pure FQ qdisc.
In which case, you leave alone SFQ and have a new qdisc.
The "removed" hashing dynamic classifier would of course be better off
it allowed the user to select a hash algorithm such as the other ones
specified in ESFQ.

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-30 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-30  9:40 [RFC NET_SCHED 00/02]: Flexible SFQ flow classification Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30  9:40 ` [RFC NET_SCHED 01/02]: sch_sfq: add support for external classifiers Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30  9:40 ` [RFC NET_SCHED 02/02]: Add flow classifier Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 11:18 ` [RFC NET_SCHED 00/02]: Flexible SFQ flow classification Andy Furniss
2007-05-30 15:32   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 16:57     ` Andy Furniss
2007-05-30 14:56 ` jamal
2007-05-30 15:27   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 16:10     ` jamal
2007-05-30 16:23       ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 16:34         ` jamal [this message]
2007-05-30 16:55           ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 17:02             ` jamal
2007-08-09  4:12   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1180542897.4109.81.camel@localhost \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).