From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/02]: Flexible SFQ flow classification Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1180544536.4109.100.camel@localhost> References: <20070530094020.24073.84277.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <1180536987.4109.19.camel@localhost> <465D97F1.9090600@trash.net> <1180541401.4109.72.camel@localhost> <465DA4E9.5060906@trash.net> <1180542897.4109.81.camel@localhost> <465DAC73.6070507@trash.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.239]:1886 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757399AbXE3RCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:19 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t15so1823667wxc for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <465DAC73.6070507@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-30-05 at 18:55 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > I could do that, but I'm perfectly happy with the qdisc part of SFQ. > Without the classifier SFQ is of course simply a FQ qdisc, all it > cares about is serving queues equally. Sure. You are writting the code - your call. cheers, jamal