From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [RFC RTNETLINK 00/09]: Netlink link creation API Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:00:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1181080819.4062.10.camel@localhost> References: <20070605141250.15650.47178.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, socketcan@hartkopp.net, xemul@sw.ru, ebiederm@xmission.com, tgraf@suug.ch To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]:2371 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759965AbXFEWAX (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:00:23 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id n1so1526194nzf for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:00:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070605141250.15650.47178.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org All patches looked really good. speaking for the ifb stuff, a definete ACK. The only thing that threw me off for a sec was the naming convention for "type" referenced via IFLA_INFO_NAME because it seems to be colliding semantic with dev->type and dev->name as in IFLA_NAME and ifi_type ifinfomsg. But i cant come with a better noun. Good stuff, nevertheless cheers, jamal