From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:59:54 -0400 Message-ID: <1182790794.5184.41.camel@localhost> References: <20070619140038.GA13629@2ka.mipt.ru> <1182270529.4968.73.camel@localhost> <18040.5105.715624.286924@robur.slu.se> <20070619.152801.99185860.davem@davemloft.net> <1182441257.5017.48.camel@localhost> <1182442099.5017.51.camel@localhost> <20070621165546.GH15814@kvack.org> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, gaagaan@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com, sri@us.ibm.com To: Benjamin LaHaise Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232]:15380 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbXFYQ76 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:59:58 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t15so1513087wxc for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070621165546.GH15814@kvack.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-21-06 at 12:55 -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > You should qualify that as 'Old P4 Xeon', as the Core 2 Xeons are leagues > better. The Xeon hardware is not that old - about a year or so (and so is the opteron). BTW, how could you tell this was old Xeon? cheers, jamal