From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@broadcom.com>
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
Gagan Arneja <gaagaan@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching - tg3 support
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:09:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183468188.5159.73.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1183411245.6609.16.camel@teletran1>
On Mon, 2007-02-07 at 14:20 -0700, Matt Carlson wrote:
>
> Hi Jamal. I'll be testing your patch soon,
much thanks. Please let me know if you need help while doing this.
What tools are you planning to test with? I have tested this patch
with pktgen on a dual opteron/tg3-buggy.
There is an outstanding issue in regards to clocksource - however the
batch does well regardless of the clock source.
> but I wanted to point out a
> bug in the patch. The patch defines TG3_SKB_CB() as follows :
>
> #define TG3_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct tg3_tx_cbdata *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
>
> This definition will collide with the VLAN macros if TG3_VLAN_TAG_USED
> is set. vlan_tx_tag_get() is defined as :
>
> #define vlan_tx_tag_get(__skb) (VLAN_TX_SKB_CB(__skb)->vlan_tag)
>
> VLAN_TX_SKB_CB is defined as :
>
> #define VLAN_TX_SKB_CB(__skb) \
> ((struct vlan_skb_tx_cookie *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
>
yikes. Thanks for catching that - I thought i had this pretty much
covered after scanning the source. So that bug exists on the e1000 as
well.
[It sounds very dangerous to me the way skb->cb is being used by the
vlan code (i.e requires human intervention/knowledge to catch it as an
issue). I had no freaking idea the vlan code was using it. Maybe a huge
comment somewhere on how these cbs are being used by drivers would help
or even a registration on startup to just make sure there is no conflict
at a layer (i have been meaning to do the later for years now). In any
case this is is a digression].
In the meantime, changing it to use byte 8 and above should do it? i.e.
#define TG3_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct tg3_tx_cbdata *)&((__skb)->cb[8]))
There are 48 bytes there on the skb-cb, so there should be plenty.
> Also, I think the count, max_per_txd, and nr_frags fields of the
> tg3_tx_cbdata struct are not needed.
Yes, you are right. That was a result of the LinuxWay(tm) (aka cutnpaste
from the e1000 which needs them), Can you send me a patch for that and
TG3_SKB_CB?
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-03 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-06 13:49 [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching jamal
2007-06-07 6:16 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-07 11:43 ` jamal
2007-06-07 16:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-07 22:23 ` jamal
2007-06-08 8:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-08 11:31 ` jamal
2007-06-08 12:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-08 13:07 ` jamal
2007-06-08 21:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-08 5:05 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-19 13:21 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 13:33 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 14:00 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 14:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 16:32 ` jamal
2007-06-19 16:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 16:28 ` jamal
2007-06-19 16:35 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 16:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 17:35 ` Robert Olsson
2007-06-19 17:48 ` jamal
2007-06-19 17:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-28 0:05 ` [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching - tg3 support jamal
2007-07-02 21:20 ` Matt Carlson
2007-07-03 0:21 ` Michael Chan
2007-07-03 13:26 ` jamal
2007-07-04 4:19 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-07-04 13:22 ` jamal
2007-07-03 13:09 ` jamal [this message]
2007-07-03 19:31 ` Matt Carlson
2007-07-04 1:59 ` jamal
2007-07-03 21:30 ` David Miller
2007-06-19 22:28 ` [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching David Miller
2007-06-21 15:54 ` FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: " jamal
2007-06-21 16:08 ` jamal
2007-06-21 16:55 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 16:59 ` jamal
2007-06-25 17:08 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 17:16 ` jamal
2007-06-21 16:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-25 16:58 ` jamal
2007-06-19 16:24 ` jamal
2007-06-21 21:00 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-22 9:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-25 17:35 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-07 8:42 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-07 12:16 ` jamal
2007-06-08 5:06 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-08 11:14 ` jamal
2007-06-08 11:31 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-08 11:43 ` jamal
2007-06-08 18:00 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-08 17:27 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-09 0:17 ` jamal
2007-06-09 0:40 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-07 22:42 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1183468188.5159.73.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gaagaan@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).