From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@broadcom.com>,
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
Gagan Arneja <gaagaan@gmail.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching - tg3 support
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:26:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183469180.5159.89.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1183422081.4947.14.camel@dell>
On Mon, 2007-02-07 at 17:21 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
[Matt, please include the count in the fix per previous email]
> Only base_flags and mss are needed and these can be determined right
> before sending the frame. So is it better not to store these in the
> skb->cb at all?
long answer:
My goal with storing these values and computing them was to do certain
things that dont require holding the netif_tx_lock within a batch as
well. Evaluating the packet metadata and formating the packet to be
ready for stashing into DMA was one thing i could do outside of holding
the lock easily - and running that in loop of 100 packets amortizes the
instruction cache and allows me (when i get to it) to hold the lock for
a lot less computation.
In the e1000 for example i was able to go as far as computing how many
descriptors are needed per skb and stashing those in the skb->cb; the
way the tg3 is structured makes doing all that needing some big changes.
So to answer your question: It would be nice if i could keep the skb->cb
for now and we can get rid of it later if deemed a nuisance for
batching.
>
> + dcount = tg3_tx_avail(tp);
> if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(tp->dev) &&
> - (tg3_tx_avail(tp) > TG3_TX_WAKEUP_THRESH(tp)))) {
> + (dcount > TG3_TX_WAKEUP_THRESH(tp)))) {
> netif_tx_lock(tp->dev);
> + tp->dev->xmit_win = 1;
> if (netif_queue_stopped(tp->dev) &&
> - (tg3_tx_avail(tp) > TG3_TX_WAKEUP_THRESH(tp)))
> + (dcount > TG3_TX_WAKEUP_THRESH(tp))) {
> netif_wake_queue(tp->dev);
> + tp->dev->xmit_win = dcount;
> + }
> netif_tx_unlock(tp->dev);
> }
> }
>
> This is also not right. tg3_tx() runs without netif_tx_lock().
> tg3_tx_avail() can change after you get the netif_tx_lock() and we must
> get the updated value again. If we just rely on dcount, we can call
> wake_queue() when the ring is full, or there may be no wakeup when the
> ring is empty.
You are right, I was trying to be a smart-ass there so i didnt have to
fold the lines (for readability). Can you or Matt restore it to the way
it was originally while keeping the xmit_win update and just send me a
patch?
Thanks a lot Michael and Matt for looking at this and improving it.
Maybe i should switch all my nics to tg3 from now on ;->
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-03 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-06 13:49 [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching jamal
2007-06-07 6:16 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-07 11:43 ` jamal
2007-06-07 16:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-07 22:23 ` jamal
2007-06-08 8:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-08 11:31 ` jamal
2007-06-08 12:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-08 13:07 ` jamal
2007-06-08 21:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-08 5:05 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-19 13:21 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 13:33 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 14:00 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 14:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 16:32 ` jamal
2007-06-19 16:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 16:28 ` jamal
2007-06-19 16:35 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 16:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-19 17:35 ` Robert Olsson
2007-06-19 17:48 ` jamal
2007-06-19 17:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-28 0:05 ` [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching - tg3 support jamal
2007-07-02 21:20 ` Matt Carlson
2007-07-03 0:21 ` Michael Chan
2007-07-03 13:26 ` jamal [this message]
2007-07-04 4:19 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-07-04 13:22 ` jamal
2007-07-03 13:09 ` jamal
2007-07-03 19:31 ` Matt Carlson
2007-07-04 1:59 ` jamal
2007-07-03 21:30 ` David Miller
2007-06-19 22:28 ` [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching David Miller
2007-06-21 15:54 ` FSCKED clock sources WAS(Re: " jamal
2007-06-21 16:08 ` jamal
2007-06-21 16:55 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 16:59 ` jamal
2007-06-25 17:08 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 17:16 ` jamal
2007-06-21 16:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-25 16:58 ` jamal
2007-06-19 16:24 ` jamal
2007-06-21 21:00 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-22 9:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-06-25 17:35 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-07 8:42 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-07 12:16 ` jamal
2007-06-08 5:06 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-08 11:14 ` jamal
2007-06-08 11:31 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-06-08 11:43 ` jamal
2007-06-08 18:00 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-08 17:27 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-09 0:17 ` jamal
2007-06-09 0:40 ` Rick Jones
2007-06-07 22:42 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1183469180.5159.89.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gaagaan@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).