From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: export acpi events via generic netlink Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:01:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1183550487.3812.14.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1182224403.5411.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200707031545.16787.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-v8ZmBqZoVw8uz68gP1X+" Cc: Zhang Rui , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca To: Len Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200707031545.16787.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-v8ZmBqZoVw8uz68gP1X+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:45 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > Thanks for including the demo program, Rui, it works for me (tm). >=20 > Applied -- with the incremental patch below, which I think > is correct because the only caller is bus.c, which is part of > the base kernel, not a module. Dang, mail crossing :) Are you open to reworking this on top of my multicast patches that I hope to get in soonish, or should I respin my multicast patches to ensure ACPI has a stable family and multicast group number? johannes --=-v8ZmBqZoVw8uz68gP1X+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGi4wX/ETPhpq3jKURAiYOAKCjbHp01r13B6vksUuWB5UOKeIY4QCeOoTQ P9Ieefg5jkIGK3sP8+E9QTQ= =cyOB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-v8ZmBqZoVw8uz68gP1X+--