From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth.c, make PHY device optional.
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:44:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183567479.20673.225.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27F0350-E5ED-48BF-9605-1E6BE29B9E36@kernel.crashing.org>
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:32 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > How about separate autoneg to a property "dumb-phy", which
> > indicates the
> > PHY/switch doesn't provide MII register interface.
>
> Something like that I suppose. But don't call it "dumb phy",
> nor "fake phy", nor anything similar -- there simply is _no_
> phy. If the Linux code wants to pretend there is one, that's
> one thing, but there is no need to do any of this trickery in
> the device tree.
>
> > Therefore, it should
> > use the fixed speed and duplex from device node rather than registers.
>
> Yes.
Not sure I follow, something like this?
initial-phy-capacity = <speed duplex>
no-mdio-interface
autoneg does not fit in there.
Jocke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-04 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-29 18:49 [PATCH] ucc_geth.c, make PHY device optional Joakim Tjernlund
2007-07-03 0:52 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-07-03 3:42 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-07-03 7:20 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-07-03 8:22 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-07-03 11:19 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-07-03 11:38 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-07-04 8:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-07-04 13:13 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-07-04 13:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-07-04 16:44 ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1183567479.20673.225.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se \
--to=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox