From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: export acpi events via generic netlink Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:35:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1183624541.3818.2.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1182224403.5411.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200707031545.16787.lenb@kernel.org> <1183550487.3812.14.camel@johannes.berg> <1183623847.8961.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-YYWdq1lpkbAornz9WL6G" Cc: Len Brown , "linux-acpi@vger" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca To: Zhang Rui Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1183623847.8961.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-YYWdq1lpkbAornz9WL6G Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 16:24 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > I missed the discussion about the multicast issues. > You don't need to reserve a family and group ID for ACPI. I'll rework > this on your patches.:) I don't want to hold you, don't worry, I can handle it as well. > But I don't know when these mutlicast patches can be merged while I hope > the function of exporting ACPI event via genetlink can be added ASAP. >=20 > I'm okay to hold off on this patch if you think the multicast patches > can be merged soon. Or else I tend to apply it first and send an > additional patch together with your patches later. I personally think it's ready to go and haven't received any further comments, but maybe something will come up still. I'll wait a few days and then repost as an actual .23 submission. johannes --=-YYWdq1lpkbAornz9WL6G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGjK1d/ETPhpq3jKURAgSLAKCqtD5DTqlrlHNQUJ7+g9Ns0Qgb2wCfWDr9 aoGcbSLQSpeQ8nU6L8nofEc= =nmBt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YYWdq1lpkbAornz9WL6G--