Re: [PATCH] IPROUTE2: Fix bug in display of ipv6 cloned/cached routes

[Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>]

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:46 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> > This patch fixes a bug in the 'ip' command to display 
> > IPv6 cloned routes.
> >   ip -6 route ls cache
> > returns empty even when there are cloned routes because of
> > of a missing else in print_route() routine.
> 
> 
> Looks good. The ip6_multiple_tables case seems to be missing
> filtering for cloned entries entirely, would you mind adding
> that as well?
> 

I found an issue with my original patch. If cache/cloned is 
specified, it dumps the cloned routes irrespective of the table
specified. I think this is a better fix and also should address
the case you were mentioning above.

Thanks
Sridhar

Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>

diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
index 6fe4a70..9694bc7 100644
--- a/ip/iproute.c
+++ b/ip/iproute.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ int print_route(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)
 				return 0;
 		}
 		if (filter.tb) {
-			if (r->rtm_flags&RTM_F_CLONED)
+			if (!filter.cloned && r->rtm_flags&RTM_F_CLONED)
 				return 0;
 			if (filter.tb == RT_TABLE_LOCAL) {
 				if (r->rtm_type != RTN_LOCAL)
@@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ int print_route(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)
 			}
 		}
 	} else {
+		if (filter.cloned) {
+			if (!(r->rtm_flags&RTM_F_CLONED))
+				return 0;
+		}
 		if (filter.tb > 0 && filter.tb != table)
 			return 0;
 	}