From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] netlink/generic netlink multicast group rework Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:48:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1184575711.15112.3.camel@johannes.berg> References: <20070704143037.495786000@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tv4vV8LCq2VAr+2DBsOd" Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, Patrick McHardy To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:34162 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753825AbXGPJgY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:36:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070704143037.495786000@sipsolutions.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-tv4vV8LCq2VAr+2DBsOd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 16:30 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > This is just a repost of the patches that I posted previously > because they were buried deeply in the ACPI thread and I'm > hoping that now other people will also take a look. Ping? Has anybody had a chance to look into this? I've been running regular work on my notebook with this ever since posting and it all works fine; the ACPI people would like to see this in to base the ACPI notification on it. I don't care all that much right now but if they don't base their acpi notification on it then these patches will need to be updated to give acpi a stable family/multicast number. johannes --=-tv4vV8LCq2VAr+2DBsOd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGmzDf/ETPhpq3jKURAi9/AJ9kg8bOvrilSX3BI+uqrc5AbQPt7gCgiONF KWANlC2cN733jufUUoAsCJo= =c4qk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tv4vV8LCq2VAr+2DBsOd--