From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
jgarzik@pobox.com, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFX]: napi_struct V3
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:47:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185252439.1803.174.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070723.210748.63127793.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 21:07 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Another area of consternation are drivers that were using
> netif_rx_reschedule(), as that interface was removed because it
> doesn't fit well with the caller managing the dev->quota et al. I
> left race conditions in the drivers that were using that interface,
> but they should still basically work nonetheless.
Hmm, virtio does this, if the implementation returns false from
->restart. But it's basically a bandaid for things like lguest which
don't check irq status on irq enable, hence is subject to the race.
But AFAICT netif_rx_reschedule() is implementable in a driver anyway.
What am I missing?
static void resched_me(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct foo *foo = container_of(work, struct foo, work);
irq_disable();
netif_rx_schedule(foo->dev);
irq_enable();
}
struct foo {
...;
struct napi_struct napi;
struct work_struct rescheduler;
};
int foo_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
...
enable_rx_interrupts();
netif_rx_complete(napi);
/* Broken interrupts, so we have race after enabling. */
if (unlikely(ring_has_new_packet(dev)))
schedule_work(&foo->rescheduler);
return used;
}
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-24 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-24 4:07 [PATCH RFX]: napi_struct V3 David Miller
2007-07-24 4:47 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2007-07-24 5:47 ` David Miller
2007-07-24 6:21 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25 0:45 ` David Miller
2007-07-25 1:15 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25 1:47 ` David Miller
2007-07-25 2:33 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25 4:29 ` David Miller
2007-07-25 5:09 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25 5:12 ` David Miller
2007-07-25 5:10 ` David Miller
2007-07-24 7:12 ` Francois Romieu
2007-07-24 7:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-24 7:35 ` David Miller
2007-07-28 15:21 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-29 5:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1185252439.1803.174.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).