From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [70/2many] MAINTAINERS - ARPD SUPPORT
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:04:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1187024659.10249.125.camel@localhost>
References: <46bff8e8.HhTQ7TBPy1zkcNfh%joe@perches.com>
	 <20070813114942.04a5483c@the-village.bc.nu>
	 <1187019966.10249.75.camel@localhost>
	 <20070813173522.685dab9e@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from DSL022.labridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:3187 "EHLO perches.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S973588AbXHMRFG (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:05:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20070813173522.685dab9e@the-village.bc.nu>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 17:35 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> I wouldn't add a pattern for this.

Back to:ARPD SUPPORT
P:	Jonathan Layes
L:	netdev@vger.kernel.org
S:	Maintained

> Actually I think the entire thing is a
> bad idea but thats another matter.

Of course it's not an end-all solution,
but what might work better?