From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:30:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1187699422.5324.41.camel@localhost> References: <20070821.001824.105429474.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jagana@us.ibm.com, gaagaan@gmail.com, jeff@garzik.org, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, kumarkr@linux.ibm.com, rdreier@cisco.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sri@us.ibm.com, general@lists.openfabrics.org, mchan@broadcom.com, tgraf@suug.ch, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kaber@trash.net, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070821.001824.105429474.davem@davemloft.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-21-08 at 00:18 -0700, David Miller wrote: > Using 16K buffer size really isn't going to keep the pipe full enough > for TSO. Why the comparison with TSO (or GSO for that matter)? Seems to me that is only valid/fair if you have a single flow. Batching is multi-flow focused (or i should say flow-unaware). cheers, jamal