From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, gaagaan@gmail.com,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
jagana@us.ibm.com, jeff@garzik.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
kaber@trash.net, mcarlson@broadcom.com, mchan@broadcom.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
rdreier@cisco.com, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, sri@us.ibm.com, tgraf@suug.ch,
xma@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:25:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1187907903.4279.28.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187906650.4279.16.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 2007-23-08 at 18:04 -0400, jamal wrote:
> The litmus test is the same as any change that is supposed to improve
> net performance - it has to demonstrate it is not intrusive and that it
> improves (consistently) performance. The standard metrics are
> {throughput, cpu-utilization, latency} i.e as long as one improves and
> others remain zero, it would make sense. Yes, i am religious for
> batching after all the invested sweat (and i continue to work on it
> hoping to demystify) - the theory makes a lot of sense.
Before someone jumps and strangles me ;-> By "litmus test" i meant as
applied to batching. [TSO already passed - iirc, it has been
demostranted to really not add much to throughput (cant improve much
over closeness to wire speed) but improve CPU utilization].
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-17 6:06 [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-21 7:18 ` David Miller
2007-08-21 12:30 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-08-21 18:51 ` David Miller
2007-08-21 21:09 ` jamal
2007-08-21 22:50 ` David Miller
2007-08-22 4:11 ` [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-22 4:22 ` David Miller
2007-08-22 7:03 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-22 9:14 ` David Miller
2007-08-23 2:43 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-22 17:09 ` [ofa-general] " Rick Jones
2007-08-22 20:21 ` David Miller
2007-08-23 22:04 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-08-23 22:25 ` jamal [this message]
2007-08-23 22:35 ` Rick Jones
2007-08-23 22:41 ` jamal
2007-08-24 3:18 ` Bill Fink
2007-08-24 12:14 ` jamal
2007-08-24 18:08 ` Bill Fink
2007-08-24 21:25 ` David Miller
2007-08-24 23:11 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-25 23:45 ` Bill Fink
2007-08-24 18:46 ` [ofa-general] " Rick Jones
2007-08-25 0:42 ` John Heffner
2007-08-26 8:41 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-08-27 1:32 ` John Heffner
2007-08-27 2:04 ` David Miller
2007-08-27 23:23 ` jamal
2007-09-14 7:20 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-09-14 13:44 ` TSO, TCP Cong control etc jamal
2007-09-14 17:24 ` [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB David Miller
2007-08-23 22:30 ` David Miller
2007-08-23 22:38 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-08-24 3:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-08-24 12:36 ` jamal
2007-08-24 16:25 ` Rick Jones
[not found] <20070828.215150.98552996.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <OF46DAD75A.5ADE5863-ON65257346.001C9AA3-65257346.001CB0F4@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20070828.221448.123919361.davem@davemloft.net>
2007-08-29 16:43 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-09-03 9:21 ` Krishna Kumar2
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-14 9:39 Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-08 22:01 [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-08-09 4:19 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-09 4:27 ` David Miller
2007-08-09 6:26 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-08 13:42 [ofa-general] " Herbert Xu
2007-08-09 0:06 ` Shirley Ma
2007-08-08 10:49 [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-08-08 11:09 ` Krishna Kumar2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1187907903.4279.28.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gaagaan@gmail.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jagana@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox