From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <mandeep.baines@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, rick.jones2@hp.com, msb@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, grundler@google.com,
robert.olsson@its.uu.se, venza@brownhat.org
Subject: Re: pktgen terminating condition
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:08:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1188475721.22423.35.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18133.40847.166882.838333@robur.slu.se>
On Wed, 2007-29-08 at 18:32 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:
> Yes it's synchronization issue... the test is over and we have sent
> all pkts to the device but pktgen cannot free the skb for it still
> has refcounts.
Ok, right.
I was confusing it with another issue where pktgen could send a lot of
packets without waiting for them to be freed; there are some drivers
(10G) which may hold onto 8K skbs. A gazillion ooms start spewing ;-> My
thinking in resolving that was to do something like waht sockets do and
charge pktgen so it doesnt have too many outstanding packets in flight.
> IMO must drivers have provisions to handle situation like.
Mandeep was saying he found less than a handful that didnt conform.
> I'll
> guess we can discuss last-resort timer if it should be us, ms
> or possibly seconds but shouldn't need ping to make this happen.
> If so we probably have a ICMP packet sitting there waiting instead.
I think as long as it doesnt affect throughput calculation (it just adds
to idle time) its fine.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1188347327.4305.27.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <20070829044352.GA4133@ludhiana>
2007-08-29 13:46 ` pktgen terminating condition jamal
2007-08-29 16:32 ` Robert Olsson
2007-08-30 12:08 ` jamal [this message]
2007-08-31 5:19 ` David Miller
2007-08-31 13:46 ` jamal
2007-08-29 16:59 ` Mandeep Baines
2007-08-30 11:33 ` jamal
2007-08-31 12:17 ` Daniele Venzano
2007-08-31 13:50 ` jamal
[not found] ` <20070828.220402.15268351.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <535ddc6b0708290914k21d0b71fs21ea3b96c6fd7f4d@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-29 16:26 ` Grant Grundler
2007-09-01 10:47 Daniele Venzano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1188475721.22423.35.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grundler@google.com \
--cc=mandeep.baines@gmail.com \
--cc=msb@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=robert.olsson@its.uu.se \
--cc=venza@brownhat.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).