From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Chan" Subject: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:59:18 -0700 Message-ID: <1189724358.9540.113.camel@dell> References: <46E97BB0.9030106@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: general@lists.openfabrics.org, netdev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anilgv@broadcom.com, uri@broadcom.com To: "Roland Dreier" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:11 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > I've been meaning to track down the bnx2 iscsi offload patch to look > and see if this issue is addressed, since the same problem seems to > exist: it seems an iscsi connection and a main stack tcp connection > might share the same 4-tuple unless something is done to avoid that > happening. > iSCSI does not do passive listens, only active connections to the target. But you're right, the port space is still shared between iSCSI and the main stack. We currently rely on user apps binding to the main stack to reserve certain ephemeral ports, and telling the iSCSI driver which ports to use.