From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Chan" Subject: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:09:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1189804186.9540.173.camel@dell> References: <46E97BB0.9030106@opengridcomputing.com> <1189724358.9540.113.camel@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lusinsky@broadcom.com, general@lists.openfabrics.org, talm@broadcom.com, netdev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anilgv@broadcom.com, uri@broadcom.com To: "Roland Dreier" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 09:18 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > However, do you have any plans to support iSCSI offload for targets? > Also, looking at the first CNIC patch, I can't help but notice that > you seem to have at least some support for iWARP there. How does the > CNIC look? Does it share the same interface/addresses as the > non-offload NIC, or does it create a completely separate netdevice? We will support iWARP in the future and it should be similar to the way we do iSCSI - using the same interface/addresses as the bnx2 NIC. > > I want to make sure that whatever solution we come up with for cxgb3 > doesn't cause problems for you. And of course if you have a better > idea than what Steve has come up with, that would be great :) > We are looking at these discussions with great interest. If we have any new ideas, we'll definitely let everyone know. Thanks.