From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [LARTC] ifb and ppp Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:23:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1190373789.4261.16.camel@localhost> References: <200709191417.43768.mail@frithjof-hammer.de> <46F25F9A.7010007@trash.net> <1190294388.4734.6.camel@localhost> <200709201600.15202.mail@frithjof-hammer.de> <46F2910E.9040900@trash.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Frithjof Hammer , Linux Netdev List To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]:13557 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755063AbXIULXN (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:23:13 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d31so125229and for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:23:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46F2910E.9040900@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-20-09 at 17:26 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > I don't see a good solution for this that > allows to keep the iptables rules, I'd suggest to switch to ematches. One approach could be to use ipt action: ------------------- tc filter add dev ppp0 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match u32/ematch some match flowid 1:1 action ipt -j mark --set-mark 1 .. ... .... iptables here to use the marks ... ---------------- cheers, jamal