From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq network code on SMP Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:47:43 -0400 Message-ID: <1190375263.4261.36.camel@localhost> References: <002b01c7fb86$02b27df0$d6ddfea9@JOHNYE1> <20070920.104614.58454013.davem@davemloft.net> <00e601c7fc31$4ed29890$ca8510ac@asimco> <1190375023.4261.34.camel@localhost> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org, kaber@coreworks.de To: John Ye Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:26140 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756069AbXIULrq (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:47:46 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d31so125938and for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:47:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1190375023.4261.34.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-21-09 at 07:43 -0400, jamal wrote: > one cpu in either bottom/top half has to be slightly loaded and you > loose the ordering where incoming doesnt match outgoing packet order. Actually in your case it gets worse because (if i read that code correctly) you randomly select the CPUs. cheers, jamal