From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [LARTC] ifb and ppp Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:14:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1190376888.4261.55.camel@localhost> References: <200709191417.43768.mail@frithjof-hammer.de> <46F25F9A.7010007@trash.net> <1190294388.4734.6.camel@localhost> <200709201600.15202.mail@frithjof-hammer.de> <46F2910E.9040900@trash.net> <1190373789.4261.16.camel@localhost> <46F3B16F.1060909@trash.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Frithjof Hammer , Linux Netdev List To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]:16444 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752368AbXIUMOx (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:14:53 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 36so326959wra for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:14:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46F3B16F.1060909@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-21-09 at 13:56 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > This doesn't help much since he uses the iptables marks for > classification on the ifb device, so he might as well just > classify directly using u32. true. > I think it would be nice to > have an ematch equivalent to the ipt action for matches. yes, that would help in his case. > Should be pretty easy to write > (slightly above 60 seconds > according to the documentation :)). Ah, i hadnt paid attention to that before;-> I'd like to use that whole thing on a tshirt. cheers, jamal