From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kaber@trash.net,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, jagana@us.ibm.com,
Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, rick.jones2@hp.com, xma@us.ibm.com,
gaagaan@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com,
jeff@garzik.org, mchan@broadcom.com,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, kumarkr@linux.ibm.com,
tgraf@suug.ch, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, sri@us.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCHES] TX batching
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:53:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190569987.4256.52.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189988958.4230.55.camel@localhost>
I had plenty of time this weekend so i have been doing a _lot_ of
testing. My next emails will send a set of patches:
Patch 1: Introduces explicit tx locking
Patch 2: Introduces batching interface
Patch 3: Core uses batching interface
Patch 4: get rid of dev->gso_skb
Testing
-------
Each of these patches has been performance tested and the results
are in the logs on a per-patch basis.
My system under test hardware is a 2xdual core opteron with a couple of
tg3s.
My test tool generates udp traffic of different sizes for upto 60
seconds per run or a total of 30M packets. I have 4 threads each
running on a specific CPU which keep all the CPUs as busy as they can
sending packets targetted at a directly connected box's udp discard
port.
All 4 CPUs target a single tg3 to send. The receiving box has a tc rule
which counts and drops all incoming udp packets to discard port - this
allows me to make sure that the receiver is not the bottleneck in the
testing. Packet sizes sent are {64B, 128B, 256B, 512B, 1024B}. Each
packet size run is repeated 10 times to ensure that there are no
transients. The average of all 10 runs is then computed and collected.
I have not run testing on patch #4 because i had to let the machine
go, but will have some access to it tommorow early morning where i can
run some tests.
Comments
--------
Iam trying to kill ->hard_batch_xmit() but it would be tricky to do
without it for LLTX drivers. Anything i try will require a few extra
checks. OTOH, I could kill LLTX for the drivers i am using that
are LLTX and then drop that interface or I could say "no support
for LLTX". I am in a dilema.
Dave please let me know if this meets your desires to allow devices
which are SG and able to compute CSUM benefit just in case i
misunderstood.
Herbert, if you can look at at least patch 4 i will appreaciate it.
More patches to follow - i didnt want to overload people by dumping
too many patches. Most of these patches below are ready to go; some are
need some testing and others need a little porting from an earlier
kernel:
- tg3 driver (tested and works well, but dont want to send
- tun driver
- pktgen
- netiron driver
- e1000 driver
- ethtool interface
- There is at least one other driver promised to me
I am also going to update the two documents i posted earlier.
Hopefully i can do that today.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-23 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-14 9:00 [PATCH 0/10 REV5] Implement skb batching and support in IPoIB/E1000 Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/10 REV5] [Doc] HOWTO Documentation for batching Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 18:37 ` [ofa-general] " Randy Dunlap
2007-09-17 4:10 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-17 4:13 ` [ofa-general] " Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/10 REV5] [core] Add skb_blist & support " Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 12:46 ` [ofa-general] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-09-17 3:51 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-14 9:01 ` [PATCH 3/10 REV5] [sched] Modify qdisc_run to support batching Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 12:15 ` [ofa-general] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-09-17 3:49 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-14 9:02 ` [PATCH 4/10 REV5] [ethtool] Add ethtool support Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:02 ` [PATCH 5/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Header file changes Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:03 ` [PATCH 6/10 REV5] [IPoIB] CM & Multicast changes Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:03 ` [PATCH 7/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Verbs changes Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:03 ` [PATCH 8/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Post and work completion handler changes Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 9/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Implement batching Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 10/10 REV5] [E1000] " Krishna Kumar
2007-09-14 12:47 ` [ofa-general] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-09-17 3:56 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-11-13 21:28 ` [ofa-general] " Kok, Auke
2007-11-14 8:30 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-14 12:49 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 0/10 REV5] Implement skb batching and support in IPoIB/E1000 Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-09-16 23:17 ` David Miller
2007-09-17 0:29 ` jamal
2007-09-17 1:02 ` David Miller
2007-09-17 2:14 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-09-17 2:25 ` David Miller
2007-09-17 3:01 ` jamal
2007-09-17 3:13 ` David Miller
2007-09-17 12:51 ` jamal
2007-09-17 16:37 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-09-17 4:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-23 17:53 ` jamal [this message]
2007-09-23 17:56 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/4] [NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock jamal
2007-09-23 17:58 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/4] [NET_BATCH] Introduce batching interface jamal
2007-09-23 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/4][NET_BATCH] net core use batching jamal
2007-09-23 18:02 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 4/4][NET_SCHED] kill dev->gso_skb jamal
2007-09-30 18:53 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 3/3][NET_SCHED] " jamal
2007-10-07 18:39 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 3/3][NET_BATCH] " jamal
2007-09-30 18:52 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching jamal
2007-10-01 4:11 ` Bill Fink
2007-10-01 13:30 ` jamal
2007-10-02 4:25 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-10-02 13:20 ` jamal
2007-10-03 5:29 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-10-03 13:42 ` jamal
2007-10-01 10:42 ` [ofa-general] " Patrick McHardy
2007-10-01 13:21 ` jamal
2007-10-08 5:03 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-08 13:17 ` jamal
2007-10-09 3:09 ` [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-09 13:10 ` jamal
2007-10-07 18:38 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-09-30 18:51 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/4] [NET_BATCH] Introduce batching interface jamal
2007-09-30 18:54 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 1/3] " jamal
2007-10-07 18:36 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-08 9:59 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-08 13:49 ` jamal
2007-09-24 19:12 ` [ofa-general] RE: [PATCH 1/4] [NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-09-24 22:51 ` jamal
2007-09-24 22:57 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-09-24 23:38 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-09-24 23:47 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-09-25 0:14 ` [ofa-general] " Stephen Hemminger
2007-09-25 0:31 ` [ofa-general] " Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-09-25 13:15 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-09-25 15:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-09-25 22:14 ` jamal
2007-09-25 22:43 ` jamal
2007-09-25 13:08 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-08 4:51 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-10-08 13:34 ` jamal
2007-10-08 14:22 ` parallel networking (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] [NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock) Jeff Garzik
2007-10-08 15:18 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-08 21:11 ` [ofa-general] Re: parallel networking David Miller
2007-10-08 22:30 ` jamal
2007-10-08 22:33 ` David Miller
2007-10-08 22:35 ` [ofa-general] " Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-08 23:42 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-09 1:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 14:59 ` Michael Krause
2007-10-08 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] [NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock David Miller
2007-09-23 18:19 ` [PATCHES] TX batching Jeff Garzik
2007-09-23 19:11 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-09-23 19:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-23 21:20 ` jamal
2007-09-24 7:00 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-24 22:38 ` jamal
2007-09-24 22:52 ` [ofa-general] " Kok, Auke
2007-09-24 22:54 ` [DOC] Net batching driver howto jamal
2007-09-25 20:16 ` [ofa-general] " Randy Dunlap
2007-09-25 22:28 ` jamal
2007-09-25 0:15 ` [PATCHES] TX batching Jeff Garzik
2007-09-30 18:50 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-09-30 19:19 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-07 18:34 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-08 12:51 ` [ofa-general] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-10-08 14:05 ` jamal
2007-10-09 8:14 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-09 13:25 ` jamal
2007-09-17 4:08 ` [PATCH 0/10 REV5] Implement skb batching and support in IPoIB/E1000 Krishna Kumar2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1190569987.4256.52.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gaagaan@gmail.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jagana@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kumarkr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox