From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [RFC][NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:11:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1190812311.4257.6.camel@localhost> References: <20070919.090937.32177545.davem@davemloft.net> <1190255605.4818.25.camel@localhost> <1190256183.4818.28.camel@localhost> <20070925.192811.08341847.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, dada1@cosmosbay.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.176]:27279 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752770AbXIZNMC (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:12:02 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so4163424pyb for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:12:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070925.192811.08341847.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-25-09 at 19:28 -0700, David Miller wrote: > I've applied this to net-2.6.24, although I want to study more deeply > the implications of this change myself at some point :) sounds reasonable. Ive done a lot of testing with my 2-3 NIC variants; ive cced whoever i thought was a stakeholder and they ALL seemed silently-happy-joyous (wink;->), so letting more people go at it is the best thing to do. I will be watching that space. cheers, jamal