From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:10:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1191935402.4373.172.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jagana@us.ibm.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, gaagaan@gmail.com, jeff@garzik.org, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, kumarkr@linux.ibm.com, rdreier@cisco.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com, Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org, mchan@broadcom.com, tgraf@suug.ch, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, sri@us.ibm.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, David Miller , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: Krishna Kumar2 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-09-10 at 08:39 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > Driver might ask for 10 and we send 10, but LLTX driver might fail to get > lock and return TX_LOCKED. I haven't seen your code in greater detail, but > don't you requeue in that case too? For others drivers that are non-batching and LLTX, it is possible - at the moment in my patch i whine that the driver is buggy. I will fix this up so it checks for NETIF_F_BTX. Thanks for pointing the above use case. cheers, jamal