Re: new NAPI interface broken

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

> So the powerpc platform just honors the affinity mask, and depending on
> the PIC does things that range from nothing to spreading interrupts to
> CPUs in the affinity mask.
> 
> All interrupts by defaults are spread to all CPUs (full balancing).
> 
> At this stage, it's afaik userland business to enforce different
> policies by changing the affinities via /proc/irq/*.
> 
> Do you have any pointer to how that is done on x86 or sparc64 ? On my
> x86 laptop using ubuntu gutsy, I definitely see the IRQ on which the
> network card is connected (e1000) happily spread between the 2 cores
> just like powerpc would do.

More specifically, IRQF_NOBALANCING doesn't seem to be set anywhere
except a few arch specific timer interrupts etc... nowhere I can see in
network drivers or the network stack (the stack wouldn't know what IRQ
anyway since not all drivers set netdev->irq).

We currently don't have a balance kthread like x86 has, though I wonder
if we should move this one out of x86 and make it generic (hell, it's
even hidden in the IO_APIC code :-) But at this stage, HW balancing by
the PIC is the norm and seems to be happening.

Ben.